National Open University Library

Image from Google Jackets

Standing up for nonprofits : advocacy on federal, sector-wide issues / Alan J. Abramson, George Mason University, Benjamin Soskis, Urban Institute.

By: Abramson, Alan JContributor(s): Soskis, BenjaminMaterial type: TextTextSeries: Elements in public and nonprofit administrationPublisher: Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2024Description: pages cmISBN: 9781009475976; 9781009401098Subject(s): Nonprofit organizations | CharitiesDDC classification: 658/.0480973
Contents:
Introduction -- Major, Federal, Sector-Wide Advocacy Organizations -- Sector-Wide Issues -- Sector-Wide Advocacy Resources and Tactics -- Effective Nonprofit Sector Advocacy: Grasstops Strategy -- Two Conceptions of Sector-Wide Advocacy: Special versus Public Interest -- Challenges: Cultivating Champions and Navigating Partisanship -- The Fracturing of Advocacy Infrastructure and the Growth of Issue-Based Coalitions -- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: A Case Study -- Post-TCJA Revisions and Reassessments -- Sector-Wide Advocacy in Response to the COVID-19 Crisis -- Sector-Wide Advocacy and Philanthropic Reform -- State- and Local-Level Advocacy on Sector-Wide Issues -- Recommendations for Enhancing Sector-Wide Advocacy -- Conclusion.
Summary: "This Element examines the recent history of nonprofit sector-wide advocacy at the federal level, focusing on work done by national nonprofit infrastructure organizations and national charities, to advocate on issues, such as tax incentives for charitable giving, that affect a broad range of nonprofits. The Element draws on interviews with thirty-nine national and state nonprofit leaders and federal policymakers as well as published papers and journalistic accounts. It finds that many policymakers are only weakly supportive of the nonprofit sector. In the end, this Element points to an uneasy, shifting balance in nonprofit sector advocacy between informal, decentralized, issue-based coalitions focused on short-term, if vital, legislative victories, on one hand, and the public good mandate embraced by some sector-wide advocates, which attends to longer time horizons and a broad conception of the defense of civil society, on the other. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core"--
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Books Books Gabriel Afolabi Ojo Central Library (Headquarters).
HD2769 .A27 2024 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 0194637
Books Books Gabriel Afolabi Ojo Central Library (Headquarters).
HD2769.2 .A27 2024 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 019436

Introduction -- Major, Federal, Sector-Wide Advocacy Organizations -- Sector-Wide Issues -- Sector-Wide Advocacy Resources and Tactics -- Effective Nonprofit Sector Advocacy: Grasstops Strategy -- Two Conceptions of Sector-Wide Advocacy: Special versus Public Interest -- Challenges: Cultivating Champions and Navigating Partisanship -- The Fracturing of Advocacy Infrastructure and the Growth of Issue-Based Coalitions -- Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: A Case Study -- Post-TCJA Revisions and Reassessments -- Sector-Wide Advocacy in Response to the COVID-19 Crisis -- Sector-Wide Advocacy and Philanthropic Reform -- State- and Local-Level Advocacy on Sector-Wide Issues -- Recommendations for Enhancing Sector-Wide Advocacy -- Conclusion.

"This Element examines the recent history of nonprofit sector-wide advocacy at the federal level, focusing on work done by national nonprofit infrastructure organizations and national charities, to advocate on issues, such as tax incentives for charitable giving, that affect a broad range of nonprofits. The Element draws on interviews with thirty-nine national and state nonprofit leaders and federal policymakers as well as published papers and journalistic accounts. It finds that many policymakers are only weakly supportive of the nonprofit sector. In the end, this Element points to an uneasy, shifting balance in nonprofit sector advocacy between informal, decentralized, issue-based coalitions focused on short-term, if vital, legislative victories, on one hand, and the public good mandate embraced by some sector-wide advocates, which attends to longer time horizons and a broad conception of the defense of civil society, on the other. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core"--

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha

//