Contract law and social morality / Peter M. Gerhart, Case Western Reserve University.
Material type: TextPublisher: Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2021Description: xiv,217 pagesISBN: 9781107136762; 9781316501986Subject(s): Contracts | Standardized terms of contract | Contracts | Contracts | Obligations (Law)DDC classification: 346.02/2Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books | Gabriel Afolabi Ojo Central Library (Headquarters). | K840 .G47 2021 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 0195039 | |
Books | Gabriel Afolabi Ojo Central Library (Headquarters). | K840 .G47 2021 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | 0195038 |
Introduction : understanding implied obligations : reasoning and methodology -- Individuals and relationships -- Authority's limits -- Promises and obligations -- Maximization and cooperation -- The foundations of value-balancing legal reasoning -- The scope of obligations -- The source of obligations -- Relationality redux : law on the ground and law on the books -- Legal enforceability : formation -- Performance obligations : methodological issues -- Performance obligations : the values-balancing approach -- Consumer contracts and standard terms -- Excused performance and risk allocation -- Remedies.
"Formidable barriers stand in the way of developing a unifying theory of contracts. When disputes arise, contract terms may fail to provide an unambiguous basis for determining obligations; indeterminate terms, unexpressed but implied obligations, and unaddressed ex post circumstances all require a basis from which we can use the raw material of the exchange, its text and context, to determine each party's obligations. The variety of subject matter, promissory utterances, and relationships based on promising and contracting add layers of complexity to any effort to find a single method for deciphering obligations. We might wonder whether we should ever hope to develop a unified mental map for evaluating promissory relationships as different, for example, as intimate social relationships and detailed provisions for maximizing cooperation over time. The variety is capacious enough to house many kinds of theories, but the realm is diverse enough to suggest the impossibility of a general, coherent theory of contracting and promissory obligations"--
There are no comments on this title.