000 02935cam a2200229 a 4500
020 _a1584875585
020 _a9781584875581
100 1 _aLeCuyer, Jack A.
245 1 2 _aA national security staff for the 21st century /
260 _aCarlisle, PA :
_bStrategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College,
_c2012.
300 _axv, 140 p. :
_bill. ;
490 1 _aStrategic Studies Institute monograph
500 _aFormat not distributed to depository libraries.
500 _a"December 2012."
505 0 _aLegacy 1947-89 national security system -- New global security environment -- National security system for the 21st century -- National security staff roles for the 21st century -- National security staff strategic management functions -- Development of the national security system -- Strategic choice : resourcing the national security staff to perform the strategic system management role -- Strategic partnership : fixing the future rather than the past.
520 _aOur legacy 1947/1989 national security system is unsuited for the dynamic and complex global security environment that has developed since the end of the Cold War. Over time, the National Security Council has evolved from the very limited advisory group initially imagined by President Truman to that of a vast network of interagency groups that were developed since 1989. These interagency groups view themselves as deeply involved in integrating policy development, crisis management, and staffing for the President. However, the National Security Staff (NSS) and the national security system are relics of the industrial age -- vertical stovepipes -- in an age that demands that the management of the national security system be conducted at the strategic level. What is required is a true national security strategy based on ends, ways, and means; the alignment of resources with integrated national security missions; and the assessment and accountability of management functions that should be performed by a properly resourced NSS unburdened from the urgency of the 24/7 news cycle. The President's National Security Strategy of May 2010 calls for reform in many of these areas. Section 1072 of the 2012 Defense Authorization Act calls upon the President to outline the changes and resources that are needed in both the executive branch and in Congress to implement his national security strategy. The President's response to this legislative mandate can and should be the first step in a strategic partnership for transforming our national security system, in both the executive branch and the Congress, to that of a system that can meet and anticipate the challenges and opportunities for ensuring our security and well-being.
650 0 _aNational security
650 0 _aAdministrative agencies
650 0 _aInteragency coordination
856 4 1 _uhttp://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/download.cfm?q=1142
942 _cBK
999 _c1593
_d1593